AUSTRALIA’S FREE EXPRESSION UNDER THREAT
Australia’s Jewish Labor Party Attorney-General, The Honourable Mark Dreyfus, seeks to have Opposition Leader, Tony Abbott, rescind his pledge to repeal Section 18d of the Racial Discrimination Act whereby a complainant can win an action in court not on factual evidence but on the emotional strength of experiencing a ‘hurt feeling’, i.e. if anything said or printed causes a person to experience ‘hurt feelings’, which is now labelled as HATE SPEECH.
The fraudulent aspect of this action is that FREE EXPRESSION has been split into FREE SPEECH and HATE SPEECH, thereby legally protecting Jewish self-interests that focus on matters, especially ‘Holocaust-Shoah’. Any criticism of objectionable behaviour, of values clarification, can be brushed aside because it causes ‘hurt feelings’.
Since 1996 Fredrick Töben has been fighting against this section when Australia’s organised Jews took legal action against him – and where truth was not accepted as a defence. It was enough for Jeremy Jones to claim that matters Holocaust caused him to experience ‘hurt feelings’. Jones, an experienced journalist and considered at the time to be the foreign minister of Australia’s Jews, claimed ‘hurt feelings as a defence – which fulfils Section 18d of the RDA.
Here is a selection of links to the various court cases; from 1996 until 2000 before the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, then before the Federal Court of Australia. Losing all cases meant that court costs were awarded against Fredrick Töben, and on 24 September 2012 he was declared a bankrupt.
Prior to that he had attempted to negotiate a settlement by offering $30,000 towards the $56,000 demanded. This was rejected by Slater & Gordon, acting on behalf of Jeremy Sean Jones and Steven Lewis, because as Lewis stated to Armstrong Lawyers – ‘we don’t want the money, we want to bankrupt him’, something Lewis had predicted would occur in his political speech before the NSW Jewish Board of Deputies – at 17.40 minutes into the clip:
- 1. Jones v Toben  HREOCA 39 (5 October 2000) Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission; 5 October 2000;
- 2. Toben v Jones  FCAFC 158 (21 May 2002) Federal Court of Australia – Full Court; 21 May 2002;
- 3. Jones v Toben (includes explanatory memorandum)  FCA 1150 (17 September 2002) Federal Court of Australia; 17 September 2002;
- 4. Toben v Jones  FCAFC 137 (27 June 2003) Federal Court of Australia – Full Court; 27 June 2003;
- 5. Jones v Toben (Corrigendum dated 20 April 2009)  FCA 354 (16 April 2009) Federal Court of Australia; 16 April 2009;
- 6. Toben v Jones  FCA 585 (2 June 2009) Federal Court of Australia; 2 June 2009;
- 7. Toben v Jones (No 2)  FCA 807 (30 July 2009) Federal Court of Australia; 30 July 2009;
- 8. Jones v Toben (No 2)  FCA 477 (13 May 2009) Federal Court of Australia; 13 May 2009;
- 9. Toben v Jones  FCAFC 104 (13 August 2009) Federal Court of Australia – Full Court; 13 August 2009;
- 10. Toben v Jones (No 3)  FCA 767 (8 July 2011) Federal Court of Australia; 8 July 2011;
- 11. Toben v Jones  FCA 444 (3 May 2012) Federal Court of Australia; 3 May 2012;
- 12. Toben v Jones  FCA 1193 (31 October 2012)Federal Court of Australia; 31 October 2012;
Holocaust-Shoah BELIEF is an expression of
RACIAL HATRED against GERMANS
“Nobody has the right to question the Holocaust, the suffering and death of millions of people,” the leader of the ruling Fidesz party, Antal Rogan, said in a statement Thursday, 23 May 2013.
YES, WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO QUESTION THE HOLOCAUST!
YES, AS CONCERNED CITIZENS IT IS OUR MORAL, LEGAL AND SOCIAL DUTY TO QUESTION THE HISTORICAL FACTS SURROUNDING THE PERIOD DURINGW ORLD WAR TWO THAT IS REFERRED TO AS ‘THE HOLOCAUST-SHOAH’.
YES, IT IS OUR DUTY TO EXPOSE THE MANY LIES THAT HAVE BEEN FABRCATED BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER the so-called historical event called ‘HOLOCAUST-SHOAH’ happened.
Hungarian lawmaker doubts Auschwitz museum’s historicity
A representative of the ultra-nationalist Jobbik party claims the displays ‘may not reflect real facts’
May 24, 2013, 9:07 pm
Jobbik party supporters burning an EU flag at a rally in Budapest in 2012. Photo credit: screen capture/YouTube video uploaded by Euronews.
JTA — A lawmaker for the ultra-nationalist Jobbik party in Hungary said the Auschwitz death camp museum “may not reflect real facts.”
Tamas Gaudi-Nagy made the statement Thursday during a discussion in parliament on a proposal to facilitate visits by teenagers and young adults to the former Nazi camp in Poland.
The Hungarian news agency MTI reported that Gaudi-Nagy said the site “may not reflect the real facts of history,” and that schools should not be “forced to take up such an expensive venture.”
The statement drew condemnations from Hungary’s ruling party as well as from its leading Jewish group.
“Nobody has the right to question the Holocaust, the suffering and death of millions of people,” the leader of the ruling Fidesz party, Antal Rogan, said in a statement Thursday.
The Federation of Hungarian Jewish Communities, or Mazsihisz, called on “democratic deputies in parliament” to reject Gaudi-Nagy’s remarks and also called on the House speaker “to initiate legal proceedings to restore the reputation of parliament.”
“Though the deputy did not openly deny the Holocaust, he made a sly suggestion that the memorials put up where several million victims were executed do not reflect the truth,” Mazsihisz said in its statement. “Gaudi-Nagy’s remarks have desecrated the memory of over 400,000 Hungarians who were exterminated there.”
Jobbik, Hungary’s third-largest party, has been termed “a neo-Nazi” party by Hungary’s Jewish watchdog on anti-Semitism, the Action and Protection Foundation, or TEV. Last year, one of its lawmakers, Marton Gyongyosi, said “it was time” that a list of Hungarian Jews be drawn up as they posed “a national risk,” though he later said he was referring only to Hungarians with Israeli passports.
Fredrick Töben did his basic research at Auschwitz Stammlager and Auschwitz-Birkenau in April 1997 and 1999 – he did not find the Zyklon B gas induction holes in the roof of the alleged homicidal gas chambers, nor did he find gas-tight doors in the alleged homicidal gas chamber at Auschwitz I. In 2006 he exhibited two models of alleged homicidal gas chambers at Mashhad and Teheran in Iran – Auschwitz Krema II and Treblinka. In April 1999 when he was arrested at Mannheim he stated to the indicting Magistrate that were the physical evidence to be shown to the world that homicidal gas chambers ever existed at Auschwitz, then unhesitatingly he would publish such information. Töben is still waiting for anyone to fulfil this Faurisson challenge: ‘Show me or draw me the homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz!’ – to date not a single orthodox ‘Holocaust-Shoah’ researcher has accepted this challenge. Why not?
Fredrick Töben is standing where 50 years ago to the day Rudolf Höss, Commandant of Auschwitz, was hanged for a crime he did not commit.
Wikipedia states [Rudolf Höss-From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia] : “Rudolf Franz Ferdinand Höss was an SS-Obersturmbannführer, and from 4 May 1940 to November 1943 was the commandant of Auschwitz concentration camp, where it is estimated that more than a million people were murdered.”
In 1991 the Auschwitz museum without explanation changed the original death figure from 4 million to 1.-1.5 million, i.e. after the 1988 Ernst Zündel Toronto Holocaust trial exposed the numbers fraud. However, the overarching six million Jewish deaths remained unchanged. This is because this figure has a religious significance in that it is stated, because of a translation error, that Jews will return to their homeland minus six million!
Instead of having an open question-and -answer session, a debate, on matters ‘Holocaust-Shoah’ those who protect the ‘Holocaust-Shoah’ narrative have resorted to legal persecution of Revisionist Historians. Why? They are protecting a multi-billion dollar industry and the Zionist state of Israel’s number one propaganda weapon, without which Palestinian ethnic cleansing would not be an on-going tragedy.
Think of those who refuse blindly to believe in ‘Global Warming-Climate Change’. Think of those who refuse to believe in windfarm-induced illnesses.
The program transcript from Australia’s public broadcaster, Radio National’s Background Briefing, reveals the pattern of ‘battle-of-the-wills, which follows that of those who in various so-called western democracies finally succeeded in enshrining and legally protecting, the ‘Holocaust-Shoah’ narrative. Anyone who now doubts, let alone questions its narrative and asks for physical proof of the alleged murder weapon – the homicidal gas chambers – will be deemed to be an offensive person, someone not to be debated but to be howled down and labelled: ‘HATER’, ‘HOLOCAUST DENIER’, ANTISEMITE’, ‘RACIST’, ‘NAZI’, ‘XENOPHOBE’, etc. The main justification for this legal protection is that those who believe in the ‘Holocaust-Shoah’ narrative would be devastated and experience ‘hurt feelings’, if they found out they have been lied to for over seventy years. Also, Germans would become angry at having unjustifiably billions of dollars in reparations to international Jewry’s organisations for murdering six million Jews.
When a university lecturer threatens his history students who dare ask questions on matters ‘Holocaust-Shoah’ with, ‘your question borders on the offensive’, then that teacher is a shonk because asking questions, uncomfortable and objectionable questions, is the hallmark of a thinking and active mind at work. But those who protect the ‘Holocaust-Shoah’ mythological narrative are fear-obsessed that what they are teaching students actually is rife with lies, lies, and more lies.