Welcome to New World Order Free Speech…Now Bend Over!

…getting older and older….  

 Fredrick Töben 30 years fighting legal battles

1985                                                                2015     

image004Fredrick-1-640x427

                                 

Welcome to New World Order Free Speech…Now Bend Over!

By Jonas E. Alexis on November 15, 2015

Aren’t NWO agents in favor of “diversity” and “multiculturalism” and opinionated views? Why can’t they respect the opinion of an 87 year-old woman? Couldn’t they simply say that she is just wrong? Or are they using “diversity” and “multiculturalism” to beat the Goyim over the head?

 

"NWO agents use 'diversity' and 'free speech' just to destroy Western civilization. Once you challenge their welstanschaung, they put you to jail."

“NWO agents use ‘diversity’ and ‘free speech’ just to destroy Western Civilization. Once you challenge their Weltanschauung , they put you to jail.”

…by Jonas E. Alexis

Political scientist Norman Finkelstein argues that “Zionism is a kind of romantic nationalism fundamentally at odds with liberal values.”[1]

If you doubt the accuracy of that statement, then you have been living in a cave for the past sixty years or so. It is now indisputable that Zionism and its offshoots have created a virus that can no longer be ignored.[2] Evidence?

Ursula Haverbeck, an 87-year-old woman, has been sent to prison for doubting the so-called “Holocaust.”[3] In other words, doubting is an unpardonable sin.

Descartes would have had a hard time living in the twentieth century precisely because there are certain things that he would not be allowed to doubt. Doubting, the establishment would have told him, is ideologically impermissible. The establishment would have probably sent him a letter saying something like this:

“Doubt this, doubt that, but you cannot doubt our cherished belief. We will send you to the gallows if you do. Away with your intellectual curiosity. Away with your first principle and your quest for knowledge. We tell you what to think. It is either our cherished belief or death. You choose. ”

In any event, what was Haverbeck’s unpardonable sin? She declared that “The Holocaust is the biggest and longer lasting lie in history.”[4] This is a formidable view, and once the definition of the word “Holocaust” is on the table, then the whole Shoah business crumbles.[5]

Haverbeck, of course, does not deny that people suffered during World War II, does not attack or persecute people, but does questioned the claim that people were gassed in concentration camps. This view is not weird at all.

Even Jewish historian Arno J. Mayer of Princeton argues that “sources for the study of the gas chambers are at once rare and unreliable,” and talks about the “many contradictions, ambiguities, and errors in the existing sources.”[6]

According to the New World Order, Haverbeck made a bad move. She committed a crime which ought not to be tolerated. And that crime is worse than the Israeli forces slaughtering innocent lives, plundering and pillaging homes and infrastructures, and creating a concentration camp in Gaza.

In 2008, “1518 new structures were built illegally in the West Bank.”[7] That’s not an unpardonable sin. “A 2005 report commissioned by the Israeli defense establishment was leaked in 2009 and proved that the vast majority of Israeli settlements were illegal even under Israeli law. Illegal settlements around East Jerusalem were equally problematic.” That still is no problem.

During “Operation Cast Lead,” the Israeli forces slaughtered 1417 Palestinians, “929 of whom were civilians, including women and children. Thousands of homes were destroyed, and schools, universities and mosques were bombed.”[8]

A Norwegian medical doctor by the name of Mads Gilbert, who was working in

“Gaza’s overwhelmed central hospital, sent a text message to his friends: ‘We are wading in death, blood and amputees. Many children. A pregnant woman. I have never experienced anything so terrible. Now we hear tanks. Pass it on, send it around, shout it out.’ Israel called thousands of homes to warn them of impending attacks, seemingly oblivious to the fact that residents were trapped in the Strip with nowhere to go.”[9]

But again NWO agents saw no problem here at all.

We are told that “Israeli soldiers left graffiti in some Palestinian homes that read, ‘We can to annihilate you’ and ‘Death to the Arabs.’ Palestinians reported returning to their homes after the war and finding them completely destroyed, even ‘a pair of soldier’s trousers in the bathtub, soiled with shit.’ The Bush administration offered full support for the onslaught. Barack Obama, then President Elect, remained largely silent.”[10] No problem again.

There is more: “rabbis instructed religious members of the Israeli Defense Force to show no ‘mercy to the cruel enemy’ in Gaza.”[11] Of course, there is still no problem. In fact, NWO agents find it permissible to kill, maim, butcher, and completely annihilate Palestinians at will.

Jewish writer Antony Loewenstein writes:

“The most infamous massacre of Palestinians took place at the village of Deir Yassin on 9 April 1948. Two Jewish paramilitary groups, the Irgun and Lehi, had attempted to break the Arab siege of Jerusalem and had murdered about 110 Palestinian men, women and children. Afterwards, Menachem Begin issued the following statement:

“‘Accept my congratulations on this splendid act of conquest. Convey my regards to all the commanders and soldiers. We shake your hands. We are all proud of the excellent leadership and the fighting spirit in this great attack…Tell the soldiers: you have made history in Israel with your attack and your conquest. Continue this until victory. As in Deir Yassin, so everywhere, we will attack and smite the enemy. God, God, thou has chosen us for conquest.’”[12]

If NWO agents and their puppets are not upset about all these historical facts, then all of a sudden they want to go crazy in Paris? Even if we grant that the Paris incident actually took place, there is an obvious double standard here that is hard to reconcile. As Denis Rancourt has recently put it:

“The US and its allies murdered one million civilians in Iraq, using indefinite sanctions and war, destroyed all public infrastructure, and gutted all institutions. Do you think that would cause some people to be pissed off and desperate?

“These ‘leaders of the free world’ went on to inflict the same such ‘humanitarian’ medicine on Afghanistan, Libya, and now Syria (by proxy) and Yemen. And these “leaders” condone the regular genocidal slaughters perpetrated by Israel as part of its brutal occupation and program of land seizures.

“Do you think some people are starting to grasp the meaning of US ‘freedom and democracy’? These wars target the land-based resources and territories of the Middle East, and target the Muslim populations in order to incapacitate them sufficiently not to develop self-governance. As such, these are racist wars, and their impact on populations is necessarily the imposition of extreme racist suppression?”

Fredrick-1-640x427“I can never commit myself to the intellectually perverse and morally repugnant ideology that NWO agents are forcing upon us all. If they think I will surrender, then they’ve got another thing coming.”

 

Sir Douglas Wright stated the following points that make up the usual character assassination process:

1. Defame the victim’s professional competence, mental balance, truthfulness, etc.

2. Reward collaborators from the victim’s group.

3. Weld together the pack of prosecutors.

4. Proclaim authority of the corporation.

5. Spread defamation through the victim’s personal links and loyalties.

6. Isolate the victim by giving him the silent treatment.

7. Usually this leads to the victim’s resignation which is taken as proof of guilt. Dismissal occurs if the victim refuses to resign.

8. A strong victim highlights the moral standards of society.

9. People in authority perpetuate their own types because no one wishes to be shamed by his successor.

10. Employees are as courageous as their security of livelihood and reputation permits.

11. A governing body of an institution devoted to truth and justice is corrupt if it obstructs enquiry into its stewardship.

 

Ursula Haverbeck, as far as I know, hasn’t killed anyone. She is articulate, calm, and cogent. She is old, and obviously has no time for ideological revelry. But again questioning even one key aspect of World War II is a ground on which no one is allowed to tread. NWO agents will not accept that at all.

For Denis Rancourt to challenge the Zionist mafia at the University of Ottawa? That’s a crime. For Arthur Topham to publish things that the Dreadful Few do not like? He deserves to go to jail.

For my good friend Dr. Fredrick Toben to publish some of the lies that have been perpetuated in the name of history? He ought to spend months and months in jail.

But for Neoconservative psychopaths to preach and teach perpetual wars in the Middle East? That’s freedom and democracy.

Balderdash!

Haverbeck in particular has no power, no army, and no significant voice. But the fact that she might be telling the truth is dangerous to the powers that be. Why?

Because NWO agents, as we have repeatedly seen in previous articles, feast on lies, colossal hoaxes, and complete fabrications.

There is another aspect of this issue. Aren’t NWO agents in favor of “diversity” and “multiculturalism” and opinionated views? Or are they using “diversity” and “multiculturalism” to beat the Goyim over the head? Well, we’ll let Barbara Spectre answer those questions for us:

So, whenever you see a New World Order agent dancing in front of a camera and propounding one lie after another in the name of “democracy” and “freedom,” you know what to say: “Humor me again.”


[1] Antony Loewenstein, My Israel Question (Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 2009), Kindle edition

[2] See for example Ilan Pappe, The Forgotten Palestinians: A History of the Palestinians in Israel (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2011);The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine(Oxford: One World, 2007);

[3] Umberto Bacchi, “Ursula Haverbeck verdict: Holocaust denial ‘Nazi Grandma’ gets 10 months in prison,” International Business Times, November 13, 2015.

[4] Ibid.

[5] I have addressed this more fully in Christianity & Rabbinic Judaism, Vol. II (Bloomington: WestBow Press, 2010), 331-445. For similar studies on this issue, see for example Arno J . Mayer, Why Did the Heavens Not Darken?: The Final Solution in History (New York: Verso, 2012); Brian Mark Rigg, Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers: The Untold Story of Nazi Racial Laws and Men of Jewish Descent in the German Military (Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 2002).

[6] Arno J. Mayer, example Arno J . Mayer, Why Did the Heavens Not Darken?: The “Final Solution” in History (New York: Pantheon Books, 1988), 362, 363.

[7] Cited in Loewenstein, My Israel Question, Kindle edition.

[8] Ibid.

[9] Ibid.

[10] Ibid.

[11] Ibid.

[12] Ibid.