Fredrick Töben and his Bioethics Awards received for attending and
presenting a paper at the 2nd International Congress of Bioethics,
'with emphasis on Morality, Spirituality and Creationism',
5-7 February 2011, Teheran, Islamic Republic of Iran
- report to follow -
While we're at it, if you view the Wikipedia article about Fredrick Töben, the blatant attempt to smear his good name is part of the tactics used within the article by those who fear Truth as a guiding principle, and when there is a battle-of-the-wills situation.
For the record, the following matters ought to augment the Wikipedia sketch about Töben's character profile:
1. Australian Teacher Registration in the State of South Australia - TRB - until 2014.
2. Member of Australian College of Educators - MACE - since 1983.
3. South Australia Police: Certificate of Appreciation - International Year of the Volunteer - 2001.
4. Victorian Country Football League: Media Award - Highly Commended ABC Sport - 1989.
5. Goroke Tidy Town Award - 1986.
DO I TELL THE TRUTH OR DO I OBEY THE LAW?
From the Commander of Ghost Troup Captain Eric May
Remember how the HIV = AIDS hypothesis was established without peer review?
Remember how the cancer virus hunters had a failed field day trying to find HIV?
Think of Prof Arthur Butz's 12-point analysis of the Holocaust narrative.
wrote many years ago, in the Foreword to my book The Hoax of the
Twentieth Century, that my historical investigations were motivated by my
"Noting the obvious ways in which this legend is exploited in
contemporary politics, notably in connection with the completely illogical
support that the U.S. extends to Israel". That political judgment of mine
didn't make me a revisionist; the investigations that were thereby motivated
made me a revisionist. I found rubbish. "
"Wikileaks output material is 'seeded' - the result of Israel spying on the USA"
we have Israel and India destabilising Pakistan...
- worry about Assange/democracy but not about Revisionists. Why not?
Re: Julian Assange's Wandsworth Prison time -
- watch Fredrick Töben talking with Dr Hesham Tillawi -
scroll down to 'Fascinating videos of London Prisons' 3rd item
Australian Press Club Luncheon - Pauline Hanson One
Nation MP - 8 March 2001
At 38:37 Wendy, ABC, asks Pauline how she feels about having the support of Dr Fredrick Töben...
A LEAD FOR FREEDOM FROM THE USA - SENATOR RON PAUL
* TRUTH WILL OUT *
OFFICIAL CONSPIRACY THEORIES - A False Conspiracy?
The challenge to Wikileaks: publish the documents about 9:11 and Holocaust-Shoah!
9:11 and the Holocaust-Shoah Ponzi Scheme are the hard issues while Wikileaks leaks the soft issues that divide the 'men from the boys' and protects Israel and kills the Palestinians - and aims to incite war against the Islamic Republic of IRAN.
Yet Wikileaks will not expose the new dialectic that on 1 September 2001 replaced the old, which is now driving our global politics.
As the old dialectic - Marxism/Capitalism - finally crumbles and the climate change fraud fails to produce the goods in the form of a universal tax for a political global bureaucracy the former world lefties - neocons - have found a new cause: freedom of expression, which they split into free speech and hate speech, thereby retaining their friend-foe dialectic.
Matters Holocaust-Shoah and 9:11 are off-limit. WHY?
Bell writing in Bellfast Telegraph, Monday, 19 July 2010 spells it out:
His obsession with secrecy, both in others and maintaining his own, lends him the air of a conspiracy theorist. Is he one?
"I believe in facts about conspiracies," he says, choosing his words slowly. "Any time people with power plan in secret, they are conducting a conspiracy. So there are conspiracies everywhere. There are also crazed conspiracy theories. It's important not to confuse these two. Generally, when there's enough facts about a conspiracy we simply call this news."
What about 9/11?
"I'm constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud."
What about the Bilderberg conference?
is vaguely conspiratorial, in a networking sense. We have published their
WIKILEAKS provokes a storm
Fredrick Töben praying for a safe trip to I R Iran
- a bid for German freedom from Jewish influence
I'm a denier - it was all a HOAX - a Ponsi scheme -there was no
debate -just a lie….
The Bracken/Faine Saga
A brilliant commentary by Anthony Lawson starts it off:
The next day Kevin Bracken hammered Jon Faine again:
This is how Julia Gillard responded in Parliament:
In the aftermath Faine saw fit to keep on ranting:
Kevin Bracken on the popular Alex Jones show in the US:
PRISONERS who refuse to believe in the self-mythologising
A - 2552 Hirtenberg
order to bring about the destruction of the richest, the most powerful, the
most glorious and the most flourishing states, nothing is necessary beyond the
restricted liberty of opinion....Pope Gregory XVI --1572-1585
Money Problems in European Union
The most accepted notes are marked with an X & they come from Germany:
Y Griechenland - Greece
N Österreich - Austria
P Niederlande - Holland
U Frankreich - France
This haunting theme is ideal
for the current Cukoo's Nest of world politics where the Iranian President, Dr
Mahmoud Ahmadineja, in his address before the United Nations in New York on 23
September 2010, offers clarity of thought on matters 'Holocaust-Shoah' and
'9:11' while the free and democratic western democracies are shrouded in
darkness and deception, criminalising thoughts and opinions that would
otherwise liberate the world from oppression of the worst kind - the outlawing
of telling the truth.
The TRUTH concept is the
foundation of our global civilization and the lies told about 9:11 and
'Holocaust-Shoah' are destroying its very foundations by deflecting from the
real ills confronting us, namely the uncontrolled global predatory financial
system that prior to World War Two devastated the lives of millions of
3 DIMENSION PICTURES
Click on the URL and move your
mouse around to get a 360 degree view
Mr Death The Rise and Fall of Fred A Leuchter Jr.
...remember this one?...
Peter Wakefield Sault says:
The 'Holocaust' was an
alleged genocide of Jews by Germans during World War Two where the particular
ethnic group that claims six million of their 'mishpucka' were murdered
actively discourages any independent investigation to the extent,
in many countries,
anyone who dares to publish results
the slightest doubt upon the official account established by a US
Military Tribunal at Nuremberg will
likely get jailed for his efforts.
In every other alleged
genocide of an ethnic group those claiming to have been the victims have cried
out for in-depth, open, frank and independent investigations.
investigations have invariably demonstrated that the genocides really did take
place, so why exactly would Organized Jewry oppose any in
respect of the 'Holocaust'?
>> A MUST <<
'I have no fear of those bastards, I want to expose them all'
Why destroy someone's credibility or assassinate them?
is not reason, it is not
fire it is
for a moment should
DO I TELL THE TRUTH OR DO I OBEY THE LAW?
The moral stance is:
Tell the Truth & obey the Law, not one or the other.
Marxist-Feminist-Internationalists use the
death dialectic: win-lose.
The Hegelian dialectic is: win-win.
>> THERE IS NO ALTRUISM IN INTERNATIONALISM <<
Fredrick Töben says:
The HOLOCAUST-SHOAH allegations are an attack on my
identity as a German-born Australian! It is my moral & human
right to think and to express my views on any aspect of this historical topic.
Professor Dr Elisabeth Walther-Bense – the second of five professors at the
University of Stuttgart involved in granting on 9 February1977 Fredrick Töben
the doctor of philosophy degree – advised him in April 1997 that it is legitimate
ask questions about the alleged German extermination of six million Jews.
Kevin Käther, a German who still wants
to be a German, fights for Truth in History.
Words That Think For Us - The tyranny of denial
By Edward Skidelsky - Lecturer in philosophy, University of Exeter
“Denial” is an
ordinary English word meaning to assert the untruth of something. Recently,
however, it has acquired a further polemical sense. To “deny” in this new
sense is to repudiate some commonly professed doctrine. Denial is the secular
form of blasphemy; deniers are scorned, ridiculed and sometimes prosecuted.
Where does this new
usage come from? There is an old sense of “deny,” akin to “disown,”
which no doubt lies in the background. (A traitor denies his country; Peter
denied Christ.) But the more immediate source is Freud. Denial in the Freudian
sense is the refusal to accept a painful or humiliating truth. Sufferers are
said to be in a “state of denial” or simply “in denial.” This last
phrase entered general use in the early 1990s and launched “denial” on its
denial” was the first political application, followed closely by “Aids
denial,” “global warming denial” and a host of others.
An abstract noun,
“denialism,” has recently been coined. It is perhaps no accident that
denial’s counterpart, affirmation, has meanwhile acquired laudatory
overtones. We “affirm” relationships, achievements, values. Ours is a
relentlessly positive culture.
An accusation of
“denial” is serious, suggesting either deliberate dishonesty or
self-deception. The thing being denied is, by implication, so obviously true
that the denier must be driven by perversity, malice or wilful blindness.
Few issues warrant
such confidence. The Holocaust is perhaps one, though even here there is room
for debate over the manner of its execution and the number of its victims. A
charge of denial short-circuits this debate by stigmatising as dishonest any
deviation from a preordained conclusion. It is a form of the argument ad
hominem: the aim is not so much to refute your opponent as to discredit his
The extension of the
“denier” tag to group after group is a development that should alarm all
liberal-minded people. One of the great achievements of the
Enlightenment–the liberation of historical and scientific enquiry from
dogma–is quietly being reversed.
- In Prospect
Prisoners of Conscience
of the World
That controversial salute:
Take your pick!